Monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP. METHODS: A panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: 937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events. CONCLUSION: The extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.

Case Report: Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis and Tropical Pulmonary Eosinophilia Co-Occurrence Masquerading as Refractory Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis.

Pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophilia are a heterogeneous group of disorders that are characterized by pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph and elevated levels of eosinophils in the peripheral blood. Among patients with these disorders, reports of either allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) or tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (TPE) are common. However, the simultaneous occurrence of ABPA and TPE is not often reported. We present the case of a young man with a history of asthma who was diagnosed with ABPA and TPE. Initially, the patient exhibited a partial response to treatment of ABPA, but persistent symptoms and eosinophilia led to suspicion and subsequent diagnosis of TPE. With implementation of antifilarials and steroids, the patient experienced satisfactory clinical and serological improvements. This case underscores the importance of considering multiple diagnoses in patients with overlapping symptoms and highlights the need for comprehensive management strategies in complex lung diseases.

Dupilumab suppresses relapsing chronic eosinophilic pneumonia with severe asthma.

Dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia is mediated by blockade of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway, which reduces eosinophil migration from peripheral blood. The increase in peripheral blood eosinophils may lead to chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) and/or eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, but a direct causal connection between dupilumab and eosinophilic lung diseases has not been established. A 33-year-old Japanese woman with bronchial asthma since age three was treated with fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol twice daily after several asthma exacerbations at age 17. Her course was complicated by CEP at age 33 which resolved without the need for systemic steroids. However, in the four months following resolution of her CEP, the patient had three asthma exacerbations, and a recurrence of CEP, with blood leukocytes of 8500/µL, of which 25.0% were eosinophils. She was treated with prednisolone 50 mg/day, but she could not continue this dose due to the onset of myalgia. Then she had relapsing CEP twice within three months. She was treated with prednisolone 15 mg/day for CEP, but she had persistent asthma for more than one month; dupilumab was added at 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every two weeks. In the first month of treatment with dupilumab, the patient's asthma symptoms resolved completely, and she had only one relapse of CEP. In 12 months of follow-up, she had neither an asthma exacerbation nor another relapse of CEP. Dupilumab may be a promising treatment for patients with refractory asthma complicated by recurring CEP and undesirable steroid side effects.

A case of bullous pemphigoid developing under treatment with benralizumab for bronchial asthma.

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by itchy erythema and tense blisters on the whole body. Recent reports have unveiled the pathogenic roles of eosinophils in BP (e.g., dermal-epidermal separation, generation of pruritus). Thus, eosinophils are considered a therapeutic target. Benralizumab is an anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (IL-5Rα) monoclonal antibody (mAb) that is widely used to treat severe eosinophilic asthma. By affecting IL-5Rα, benralizumab depletes eosinophils and basophils due to apoptosis through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The efficacies of benralizumab and other biologics, including bertilimumab (anti-eotaxin-1 mAb) and mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 mAb), were evaluated in several clinical trials. Also, reslizumab, an anti-IL-5 mAb, was reported as a successful treatment option in a case of BP. We present a case of severe asthma treated with benralizumab at 8-week intervals for 3 years before BP developed. Histologically, subepidermal blisters without eosinophilic infiltration were observed. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy followed by 40 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day) of oral prednisolone (PSL) was initiated, but the skin lesions worsened. Additional intravenous immunoglobulin and oral azathioprine enabled the oral PSL to be tapered. The benralizumab was discontinued after the onset of BP because the asthma did not worsen. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of BP developing during anti-eosinophil therapy. BP may occur paradoxically via various pathways during treatment with drugs that are typically effective against BP.

The clinical features of asthma exacerbations in early-onset and eosinophilic late-onset asthma may differ significantly.

Over 20 years ago, the concept of asthma control was created and appropriate measurement tools were developed and validated. Loss of asthma control can lead to an exacerbation. Years ago, the term "clinically significant asthma exacerbation" was introduced to define when a loss of control is severe enough to declare it an asthma exacerbation. This term is also used by health insurances to determine when an exacerbation is eligible for reimbursement of biologics in clinical practice, however, it sometimes becomes apparent that a clear separation between loss of "asthma control" and an exacerbation is not always possible. In this review, we attempt to justify why exacerbations in early allergic asthma and adult eosinophilic asthma can differ significantly and why this is important in clinical practice as well as when dealing with health insurers.

Prevalence of eosinophilic, atopic, and overlap phenotypes among patients with severe asthma in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilia is a significant factor in asthma severity; however, the prevalence of severe eosinophilic asthma in Saudi Arabia is largely unknown. We aimed to determine the prevalence of the eosinophilic (defined in this study as ≥ 300 cells/mm3 in blood), atopic (atopic phenotype 1, defined in this study as > 100 IU/mL total serum IgE; atopic phenotype 2, defined in this study as > 150 IU/mL), and overlap phenotypes among patients with severe asthma in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in centers specialized in severe asthma management. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with severe asthma were enrolled. Study patients responded to the Global Initiative for Asthma 2018 assessment of asthma control questionnaire and provided study investigators with current information related to the study objectives. Additional medical record data and a blood sample for total serum IgE and complete blood count were collected. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled; 83% were female and the mean (standard deviation) age was 48.7 (13.2) years. Forty-five (45%) patients had the eosinophilic phenotype, 50 (50%) had atopic phenotype 1, and 25 (25%) had phenotypic overlap (eosinophilic and atopic 1). Forty-one (41%) patients had atopic phenotype 2 and 23 (23%) had phenotypic overlap (eosinophilic and atopic 2). Asthma control and oral corticosteroid use patterns were similar and there were no significant differences in number of asthma exacerbations across phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In Saudi Arabia, 45% of patients with severe asthma had the eosinophilic phenotype, which is most likely an underestimation as no clinical features of eosinophilia were taken into account in the definition of eosinophilia. Approximately half of them had phenotypic overlap with the atopic phenotype. Trial registration NCT03931954; ClinicalTrials.gov, April 30, 2019.

Diagnostic possibility of the combination of exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil count for eosinophilic asthma.

BACKGROUND: Tests to identify reversible airflow limitation are important in asthma diagnosis, but they are time-consuming and it may be difficult for patients to cooperate. We aimed to evaluate whether the combination of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and blood eosinophil (B-Eos) can be used to distinguish some asthma patients who could avoid objective tests. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 7463 suspected asthma cases between January 2014 and December 2019 in Chongqing, China, and identified 2349 patients with complete FeNO, B-Eos count, and spirometry data. Asthma was diagnosed by clinicians by the criteria of recurrent respiratory symptoms and a positive bronchial-provocation or bronchodilation test (BPT, BPD). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FeNO or B-Eos alone or both in combination for asthma using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: In this study, 824 patients were diagnosed with asthma. When FeNO and B-Eos counts were used in combination, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnosing asthma increased slightly (0.768 vs. 0.745 [FeNO] or 0.728 [B-Eos]; both P < 0.001). The odds ratio for having asthma increased progressively with a gradual increase in FeNO or B-Eos count (both P < 0.001; assessed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test). Further analysis of in-series combinations of different threshold values for these biomarkers indicated that moderately elevated biomarker levels (FeNO > 40 ppb and B-Eos > 300 cells/µl) support a diagnosis of asthma because diagnostic specificity was > 95% and the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was > 10. This conclusion was verified when selecting the 2017-2019 data as the internal validation dataset. CONCLUSION: FeNO or B-Eos count alone is insufficient to accurately diagnose asthma. Patients with moderately elevated biomarkers (FeNO > 40 ppb and B-Eos > 300 cells/µl) could be diagnosed with asthma and avoid objective tests when such tests are not feasible.

Chronic eosinophilic pneumonitis due to the inhalation of aerosolized face lotion: A case report.

RATIONALE: Inhalation of toxic agents can induce eosinophilic pneumonia. However, only a few case reports demonstrate that exposure to materials can induce chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). Here, we describe a rare case of CEP with mild alveolar hemorrhage due to the inhalation of aerosols from face lotion. This is the first report of eosinophilic pneumonia caused by face lotion exposure. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 39-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with cough and dyspnea for 2 months, which coincided when she started to use a new aerosolized face lotion. Laboratory findings showed high blood eosinophil levels, and chest computed tomography (CT) scans revealed bilateral peripheral consolidation and ground-glass opacity mainly in the left upper lobe. She underwent flexible bronchoscopy. Eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were slightly elevated, and the gross appearance of BALF was bloody. The histological examination of the transbronchial lung biopsy showed infiltration of eosinophils and macrophages in alveolar septa with edema and without vasculitis and granuloma formation; a small number of hemosiderin-laden macrophages were also observed. An inhalation challenge test involving the face lotion was performed. Six hours after the test, the blood test showed an increased white blood cell (WBC) count, and chest radiography showed slight exacerbation. Forced vital capacity decreased the following day. DIAGNOSIS: According to histological analysis and positive result of an inhalation challenge test, she was diagnosed with CEP with mild alveolar hemorrhage due to inhalation of aerosols from the face lotion. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: She gradually improved without medication after stopping the use of face lotion. LESSONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of CEP with mild alveolar hemorrhage due to the inhalation of face lotion. Various inhaled agents, such as face lotion, can induce CEP in rare cases.

Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage in the setting of eosinophilic pneumonia.

A 65-year-old woman who presented with a constellation of symptoms, including cough with haemoptysis, fever, chills and hypoxia along with weight loss, was found to have diffuse alveolar haemorrhage. After a myriad of investigations returned normal, an open lung biopsy was performed, which revealed the diagnosis to be subacute eosinophilic pneumonia. This is one of its kind of rare presentations where eosinophilic pneumonia presents as diffuse alveolar haemorrhage and has been reported only five times prior to this.

Clinical and economic consequences of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma.

Severe asthma is burdened by frequent exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), which worsen patients' health and increase healthcare spending. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and economic impact of switching from omalizumab (OMA) to mepolizumab (MEP) in patients eligible for both biologics, but not optimally controlled by omalizumab. We retrospectively enrolled uncontrolled severe asthmatic patients who switched from OMA to MEP during the last two years. Information included blood eosinophil count, asthma control test (ACT), spirometry, serum IgE, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), OCS intake, drugs, exacerbations/hospitalizations, visits and diagnostic exams. Within the perspective of Italian National Health System, a pre- and post-MEP 12-month standardized total cost per patient was calculated. 33 patients were enrolled: five males, mean age 57 years, disease onset 24 years. At OMA discontinuation, 88% were OCS-dependent with annual mean rate of 4.0 clinically significant exacerbations, 0.30 exacerbations needing emergency room visits or hospitalization; absenteeism due to disease was 10.4 days per patient. Switch to MEP improved all clinical outcomes, reducing total exacerbation rate (RR = 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.14), OCS-dependent patients (OR = 0.02, 95% CI 0.005-0.08), and number of lost working days (Δ = - 7.9, 95% CI - 11.2 to - 4.6). Pulmonary function improved, serum IgE, FeNO and eosinophils decreased. Mean annual costs were €12,239 for OMA and €12,639 for MEP (Δ = €400, 95% CI - 1588-2389); the increment due to drug therapy (+ €1,581) was almost offset by savings regarding all other cost items (- €1,181). Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, not controlled by OMA, experienced comprehensive benefits by switching to MEP with only slight increases in economic costs.

Efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in a real-world cohort of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

BACKGROUND: The interleukin 5 (IL-5) pathway is an important component in the pathophysiology of severe eosinophilic asthma. Mepolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the IL-5 pathway. Clinical trials showed efficacy of Mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, reports on experience with treatment in a real-world cohort are limited. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Mepolizumab for treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma in a real-world cohort of patients. METHODS: A clinical prospective observational trial included all patients >18 years treated with Mepolizumab between March 2016 to March 2019 at Rabin Medical Center. The composite primary outcome measures evaluated: increase in FEV1 by≥ 200 ml and/or decrease in exacerbation rate of ≥50% and/or cessation of oral corticosteroids (OCS) treatment or ≥50% decrease in dosage. Also evaluated: blood eosinophil count, adverse events and quality of life. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, 50 (82.0%) achieved the primary outcome. The number of patients who suffered from frequent exacerbations decreased from 52 (85.2%) to 8 (13.1%) (p < 0.001). Twenty-two patients (68%) stopped OCS treatment or received >50% reduced dosage (p < 0.001). Mean FEV1 increased from 1.72 ± 0.78 liters to 1.87 ± 0.85 liters (p = 0.043). Response to therapy was seen within six months. Forty-nine patients (80%) reported an improvement in quality of life (p < 0.001). Only minor adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Treatment with mepolizumab was well tolerated and significantly lowered the exacerbation rate and OCS dependence in a real-world cohort of severe eosinophilic asthma patients. Response to therapy was within six months and treatment effect was sustained over time.

[Eosinophilic pneumonia: A rare complication of sodium divalproate]. / Pneumopathie à éosinophiles : une complication rare du divalproate de sodium.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic pneumonias are characterized by an increase in lung eosinophils. These disorders can be induced by drug reactions. CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old woman suffering from bipolar disorder and treated by sodium divalproate for more than 2 years was hospitalised in the department of respiratory medicine for dyspnoea and cough. The investigations showed severe hypoxaemia, airflow limitation, multiple ground-glass opacities and crazy paving on the chest CT-scan and a blood eosinophilia. A significant alveolar eosinophilia was found in the broncho-alveolar lavage. A complete assessment of possible causes was made. Finally, we made the diagnosis of eosinophilic pneumonia secondary to sodium divalproate. The treatment was stopped and systemic corticosteroid therapy was not introduced. The patient showed an improvement of her dyspnoea in a few days. Lung function and the CT-scan were normal within a few months. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium divalproate, frequently used in the treatment of bipolar disorder, is a rare cause of eosinophilic lung disease, even years after its introduction. Rapid diagnosis and withdrawal of treatment led to complete resolution in the reported case.

Biologics for oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma.

Background: Oral corticosteroid (OCS) dependent asthma is one of the severe asthma phenotypes that requires personalized treatment. Objective: To review the role of biologic treatments in OCS-dependent asthma. Methods: A nonsystematic review was performed of emerging multiple novel biologics for potential treatment of OCS-dependent asthma. Results: The serious adverse effects of OCS can be seen as a result of their regular long-term administration. Anti-interleukin (IL) 5 (mepolizumab), anti-IL-5R (benralizumab), and anti-IL-4Rα (dupilumab) are the therapies of choice for OCS-dependent severe asthma. Results of studies showed the efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, especially in patients with the OCS-dependent severe eosinophilic asthma phenotype and with nasal polyps. Dupilumab may be the therapy of choice of monoclonal antibodies in cases of moderate-severe atopic dermatitis accompanied by OCS-dependent severe asthma. For reslizumab and omalizumab, placebo controlled double-blind studies conducted with OCS-dependent patient populations are needed. Conclusion: Biologics are effective in the "OCS-dependent asthma" phenotype as add-on therapy. It seems that chronic OCS use in OCS-dependent asthma will be replaced by biologic agents that specifically target type 2 inflammation, along with a much better safety profile. However, real-life studies that compare these biologics in OCS-dependent severe asthma are urgently needed.

[Daptomycin-induced eosinophilic pneumonia associated with an early endoprosthesis infection]. / Daptomycin-induzierte eosinophile Pneumonitis im Rahmen eines Endoprothesenfrühinfektes.

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare disease characteristically involving eosinophilic infiltration of lung parenchyma as well as fever, dyspnea, and coughing. A differentiation is made between primary and secondary AEP depending on the underlying etiology. Substances that most frequently cause secondary AEP are antibiotics, such as the lipopeptide daptomycin. This is a case report about a 69-year-old female patient who underwent antibiotic treatment with daptomycin for an infection of a knee prosthesis. During the treatment, signs of pneumonia developed and included the increased dependence on mechanical ventilation of the previously intubated patient, infiltrates on a chest X­ray, fever, and an increase in serum inflammation markers. Proof of bacteria as an underlying pathogen was not possible. A thoracic computed tomography (CT) scan showed opacities that are commonly seen in interstitial lung disease. Termination of daptomycin treatment due to renal failure led to an improvement of pulmonary symptoms. Re-exposure to daptomycin resulted in a recurrence of the symptoms. The diagnostic criteria for AEP according to Uppal et al. include 1) current exposure to daptomycin, 2) dyspnea with increased oxygen requirements or necessity for mechanical ventilation, 3) new infiltrates on chest X­ray or CT scan, 4) bronchoalveolar lavage with eosinophilia >25%, 5) improvement of clinical symptoms following daptomycin withdrawal, and 6) fever. With 5 out of the 6 criteria by Uppal et al. positive-an eosinophilia >25% being the only unmet criteria-an AEP induced by daptomycin was diagnosed. Withdrawal of daptomycin as well as high-dose cortisol bolus treatment led to a rapid recovery.

Real-World Effectiveness and the Characteristics of a "Super-Responder" to Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mepolizumab was the first licensed anti-IL5 monoclonal antibody for severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). To date there are few data to confirm its efficacy in the real-world setting or assessment of baseline characteristics associated with response. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do patients with severe eosinophilic asthma respond to mepolizumab in the real world setting and which characteristics are associated with a super-response to this therapy? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who received at least 16 weeks of treatment with mepolizumab (100 mg subcutaneously) for SEA at our regional asthma center in the United Kingdom. Clinical data were collected at each 4-week visit. At 16, 24, and 52 weeks, patients were classified as "responders" or "nonresponders." A response was defined as ≥50% reduction in exacerbations; for patients whose condition requires maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS), a response was defined as ≥50% reduction in prednisolone dose. Super responders were defined as exacerbation-free and off mOCS at one year. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included in the analysis. Asthma exacerbations decreased from a baseline of 4.04 ± 2.57 to 1.86 ± 2.17 per year at one year (54% reduction; P < .001). Sixty-eight patients were receiving mOCS at the time of commencing mepolizumab. By one year, the daily median dose fell from 10 mg (interquartile range, 10 to 15) to 0 mg (interquartile range, 0 to 10; P < .001). Fifty-seven percent of them were able to discontinue mOCS; 72.7% (95% CI, 63.0 to 80.7) of the patients were classified as responders, and 28.3% (95% CI, 20.2 to 38.0) of the patients were classified as super responders. Baseline characteristics associated with responder and super responder status included the presence of nasal polyposis (P = .012), lower baseline Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (P = .006), a lower BMI (P = .014), and, in those patients receiving mOCS, a significantly lower prednisolone dose at baseline (P = .005). At 16 weeks, the one-year responder status was correctly identified in 80.8% patients; by 24 weeks, this status rose to 92.9%. INTERPRETATION: In a real-world SEA cohort, treatment with mepolizumab reduced exacerbation frequency and mOCS requirements. Nasal polyposis, a lower BMI, and a lower maintenance prednisolone requirement at baseline were associated with better outcomes. Twelve-month response was identifiable in >90% of patients by week 24.

Promising Effects of Benralizumab on Chronic Eosinophilic Pneumonia.

We herein report a case of refractory chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) complicated with uncontrolled bronchial asthma, in which remission was successfully induced with single dose of benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody against the alpha-chain of the interleukin-5 receptor. Resolution of the patient's symptoms and consolidation on chest X-ray were observed at 2 weeks and lasted for 8 weeks after the administration of benralizumab. Benralizumab would be a novel alternative choice of treatment for CEP patients who are at risk of potential toxicity due to long-term corticosteroid therapy.

Uso de biológicos para asma grave en otras indicaciones fuera de ficha técnica (off label) / Use of biologic agents for severe asthma in other indications that are off label

En la última década, hemos asistido a la introducción de los anticuerpos monoclonales para el tratamiento del asma grave, lo que ha supuesto una auténtica revolución en la vida de muchos de nuestros pacientes. Existen algunas patologías que a menudo, vemos asociadas al asma grave y con las que debemos hacer un adecuado diagnóstico diferencial como son: granulomatosis eosinofílica con poliangeitis (GEPA), síndromes hipereosinofílicos (SHE), neumonías eosinófilas crónicas (NEC) y aspergilosis broncopulmonar alérgica (ABPA) en las que se han probado dichos tratamientos con buenos resultados en la práctica clínica, pero cuya indicación se encuentra actualmente fuera de ficha técnica. Estas patologías suelen precisar para su control de tratamiento con corticoides sistémicos y/o inmunosupresores durante un tiempo prolongado, con los importantes efectos secundarios que conllevan. Las nuevas terapias están permitiendo un importante ahorro de corticoides sistémicos e incluso su retirada en muchos casos. Hemos realizado una revisión de estas enfermedades y de los resultados clínicos de dichos tratamientos biológicos en cada una. Otra situación en la que se dispone de nueva evidencia, es la utilización de biológicos para el asma alérgico grave durante el periodo de embarazo

In the last decade we have attended to the introduction of monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of severe asthma, which have supposed a real revolution in the lives of many of our patients. There are some pathologies that we often see associated with severe asthma and with which we must make an adequate differential diagnosis such as: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES), chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (cep) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). These treatments have been tested with good results in clinical practice, but being used off label. These pathologies usually require treatment with systemic corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants for a long time producing important side effects. New therapies are allowing significant dose reduction of systemic corticosteroids and even their withdrawal in many cases. We have carried out a review of these diseases and the clinical results of biological treatments in each one of them. Another situation in which new evidence is available, is the use of biologicals for severe allergic asthma during pregnancy